¿Qué es AVAATE? | Contacto | RSS 2.0 | Mapa del sitio | | | Buscar

Asociación Vallisoletana de Afectad@s por las Antenas de Telecomunicaciones - AVAATE

Portada del sitio > Prensa > El Tribunal Supremo de Israel ha ordenado al Gobierno de Israel investigar (...)

El Tribunal Supremo de Israel ha ordenado al Gobierno de Israel investigar el número de niños que sufren de EHS./ The Israeli Supreme Court Ordered the Israeli Government to Investigate the Number of Children Currently Suffering From EHS.

Domingo 28 de julio de 2013 · 1693 lecturas

El Tribunal Supremo de Israel ha ordenado al Gobierno de Israel investigar el número de nińos que sufren de EHS

Dafna Tachover, 22 de julio 2013

El 18 de julio de 2013, el Tribunal Supremo de Israel ordenó al Gobierno de Israel investigar cuántos nińos en Israel sufren de hipersensibilidad electromagnética (EHS). El Gobierno deberá presentar el resultado de su investigación a la Corte el 16 de noviembre de 2013.

La orden fue emitida en respuesta a una petición ante el Tribunal Supremo de Israel de prohibir el Wi-Fi en las escuelas presentada en agosto de 2012.

Esta orden es el resultado de un extenso alegato escrito por la abogada Dafna Tachover y presentado a la Corte el 13 de junio de 2013. Un informe de 65 páginas, con el apoyo de 640 páginas de anexos, destacó el problema de EHS y afirmó que no es razonable exponer a los nińos al WiFi cuando se ha demostrado que causa la enfermedad.

En la audiencia en el Tribunal Supremo, cuando se le preguntó al Gobierno lo que haría si un nińo con EHS asiste a una escuela, el abogado del gobernador respondió: "El WiFi se puede desactivar en la escuela."

El informe intentó demostrar: (1) EHS es una enfermedad existente, causada por los CEM, (2) la norma de seguridad térmica se demostró falsa hace ya 40 ańos, (3) no es razonable confiar en la OMS, ya que es corrupta, (4) la evaluación del Gobierno sobre el tema era poco profesional y negligente, y (5) la industria intencionalmente engańó al público

En cuanto a las normas de seguridad del informe afirmó que el argumento del Gobierno sobre que la norma existente de Israel (1/10 de la Norma térmica) "protege con absoluta certeza de los efectos adversos a la salud" es ridículo:

¿Cómo puede ser que lo proteja si la gente está enferma de EHS?

¿Cómo puede ser protectora cuando miles de documentos demuestran efectos biológicos?

¿Cómo puede ser protectora cuando aún OMS declaró RF carcinógeno 2B?

EHS

El escrito hizo hincapié en la cuestión de EHS para indicar que ya existe el dańo. Se proporcionaron declaraciones juradas de 7 profesionales con EHS, incluyendo una declaración jurada de una madre de dos hijas, quienes sufren de EHS, se presentó evidencia de apoyo científico. Se demostró que el gobierno no hizo nada para investigar el tema a pesar de un amplio aviso y obligación legal. Además, el breve intento de demostrar lo ridículo de la afirmación de que la condición no existe y / o que no se ha demostrado que es causada por los EMF.

Cabe seńalar que en correspondencia de la Sra. Tachover con el Gobierno. Comité sobre la cuestión de la tecnología Wi-Fi en las escuelas antes de la presentación de la demanda, la Comisión finalmente admitió la existencia de EHS - el comité en su informe final, escribió: "Si hay un nińo con sensibilidad a la radiación de radiofrecuencia, el Ministerio proporcionar una solución en una base individual ".

Lo siguiente: El 16 de noviembre el Gobierno. debe presentar su respuesta y los demandantes tendrán que responder 15 días después. La Corte indicó que tras la presentación de estas respuestas tiene la intención de tomar una decisión.

Dafna Tachover Lcdo. (NY, Israel) MB


The Israeli Supreme Court Ordered the Israeli Government to Investigate the Number of Children Currently Suffering From EHS.
July 23, 2013 in -Mailing List, DECT, Wi-FI, and WLAN wireless systems and health, Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity by EMFacts

From Dafna Tachover:

On July 18, 2013, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered the Israeli Government to investigate how many children in Israel already suffer from EHS.

The Order was issued in response to a Petition to the Israeli Supreme Court to ban Wi-Fi in schools that was submitted in August, 2012.

The Government must submit the result of its investigation to the court by November 16, 2013.

The Israeli Supreme Court’s decision seems to indicate that the Court does not trust the government’s statements as:

(1) Not only did the court order the Gov. to check how many children are already sick with EHS, thereby accepting the existence of EHS and its correlation to radiation, but it also demanded that the Gov. specify in its statement the exact measures it took in order to conduct the inquiry.

(2) Another indication that the Court found the statement of the Gov. unreliable can be found in the fact that the Supreme Court ordered that the Gov.’s reply on November 16, MUST be supported with a sworn affidavit; Meaning that every fact mentioned, data collected or statement made in the Gov.’s answer must be supported by an Affidavit, attesting to the truthfulness of the claim.

This order is the result of an extensive brief which was written by Dafna Tachover and submitted to the Court on June 13, 2013. A 65-page brief, supported by 640 pages of appendices, it emphasized, amongst other things, the problem of EHS and claimed that it is unreasonable to expose children to WIFI when it is proven to cause sickness.

Furthermore, it should be noted that in the July 18 Supreme Court hearing, when the Gov. was asked what it intends to do if there would be a child with EHS attending the school, the attorney for the Gov. answered: “The WIFI will be turned off in the school”.

Ms. Dafna Tachover, herself an attorney, has been representing herself since Feb 2013. Mr. Bach who represented her until that time is still representing the other Plaintiffs (including a National Parent Organization and 2 children).

It is Ms. Tachover’s opinion that even though the Government lied about its policy in regard to the deployment of WIFI, if the Court is not convinced that this technology is harmful and the damage is not hypothetical and abstract but existent and real, it will not rule that the government’s actions are unreasonable and will not ban the use of WIFI in schools.

The brief claimed that the Court was unaware that the damage from wireless technology is proven and existing, as the Court, just like the public, loves its wireless gadgets and has been reading intentionally misleading headlines in the papers such as the ones claiming that “no correlation between cell phones and cancer was proven” over the past 15 years.

The brief attempted to prove the following:
(1) Prove EHS is an existing illness, caused by EMFs
(2) Prove that the thermal safety standard was proven false as early as 40 years ago.
(3) Prove that it is unreasonable to rely on WHO considering it is corrupt.
(4) Prove that the Gov’s evaluation on the issue was unprofessional and negligent at best.
(5) Prove how the industry intentionally misled the public

Regarding the safety standards the brief claimed:

(1) The contention of the Government that the existing Israeli standard (1/10 of the Thermal Standard) “Protects with absolute certainty from known adverse health effects” is ridiculous as:

  • How can it be protective if Ms. Tachover and others are sick with EHS?
  • How can it be protective when thousands of papers prove biological effects?
  • How can it be protective when even the corrupt WHO declared RF a 2B carcinogen?

(2) The brief showed that the government is so reckless in dealing with wireless technology that it does not even know of its own ignorance in how to measure radiation from WIFI considering the special modulation of WIFI.

EHS

The brief emphasized the EHS issue to indicate that the damage already exists. Affidavits from 7 professionals with EHS were provided, including an affidavit of a mother both daughters of whom suffer from EHS, supporting scientific evidence was presented, and it was shown that the government did nothing to investigate the issue despite ample notice and - legal obligation. In addition, the brief attempted to demonstrate the ridiculousness of the claim that the condition does not exist and/or that it is not proven to be caused by EMF’s.

It should be noted that in Ms. Tachover’s correspondence with the Gov. Committees on the issue of Wi-Fi in schools prior to the submission of the lawsuit, the Committee eventually admitted the existence of EHS - the committee in its final report wrote:

“If there is a child with sensitivity to RF radiation, the Ministry will provide a solution on an individual basis”.

What next:

On Nov. 16 the Gov. must submit its Answer and the Plaintiffs will have to respond 15 days later. The Court indicated that following the submission of these responses, it intends to reach a decision.

While the Court has still not made a decision, the Court’s Order is an important development.

In the summary of the brief Gandhi’s words were quoted:

“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it. Truth stands, even if there be no public support. It is self sustained. “

It seems that the court is recognizing the truth.

Dafna Tachover Esq. (NY, Israel) MBA
PO Box 4, East Jewett, NY, 12424
US Number: + 1 (518) 734 5628
Israeli Number: 0732696361
dtachover gmail.com

Si quieres hacernos un comentario, por favor escribe un CORREO a avaate@avaate.org o utiliza este FORMULARIO DE CONTACTO. Muchas gracias.


Enviar un mensaje

Apoyo económico